For Ian Torres β€” KPMG Technology Enablement

β€œInnovation without architectural foundations is a flight destined to stay grounded.”

β€” Ian Torres

Governed, architecture-first delivery β€” at speed.

AgentUI Β· June 2026

Point of agreement

Real transformation doesn't come from rushed adoption.

It comes from doing the foundational work:

01

Define dependencies

Before automating, you must know what depends on what.

02

Clean the data

AI on dirty data reproduces chaos at scale.

03

Redesign workflows from the origin

Don't automate disorder β€” rethink the flow first.

The question isn't whether you agree. The question is: how do you get speed without abandoning the foundation?

The problem, in your language

Panama mid-market doesn't have an AI problem. It has architectural debt.

This is the grounded flight.

15 disconnected Excel files

Each department with its own version of truth. Nobody knows which one is real.

WhatsApp coordination

Critical decisions in chats with no traceability and no audit trail.

CRMs that don't fit

Bought on a promise, abandoned by friction. The team returns to Excel.

Phantom spending

Redundant subscriptions. Duplicate infrastructure. Nobody has the inventory.

Code, process & balance sheet don't speak

The system says one thing. The process another. The financials yet another.

What AgentUI is

A managed AI app builder.

The speed is the outcome of having architecture built in β€” not a shortcut around it.

01

Plain-language description

The client describes the system they need. No tech-speak.

02

AI builds it

AgentUI generates the internal system with architecture built in.

03

Human team reviews, hosts, maintains

Review, deployment, and maintenance by our team. Not a demo β€” production.

Critical distinction

Not Lovable, Bolt, or a generic builder that hands you a demo. AgentUI delivers a working, managed system in production β€” with governance and architecture already inside.

Governed build in action

Before anything generates, AgentUI proposes the architecture β€” and puts it up for review.

Not "trust us." Inspect the schema. Approve the dependency graph. Then it builds.

Representative scenario

AgentUI Β· Build session

We need fleet tracking for a mid-market logistics client. Propose the architecture before generating.

AgentUI is working

Data schema proposed

Dependency graph generated

Permission model (RBAC) defined

Awaiting human approval...

Ask for a change...↡

Proposed architecture Β· v1

a8f3c Β· pending review

Generated schema Β· 4 entities Β· 3 relations

clients

PK
iduuid
nametext
tierenum

vehicles

PK
iduuid
platetext
capacity_kgint

routes

FK Γ— 2
client_id→ clients
vehicle_id→ vehicles
cost_usddecimal

audit_log

built-in
actor_iduuid
actiontext
attstz

Access control

admin→ all
dispatcher→ r/w routes
client→ own only

Your phrase, our architecture

Visibility by design.

β€” Ian Torres

Shared databases

One source of truth. Goodbye to 15 parallel Excels.

Global audit logs

Every action logged: who, what, when. Traceability by default.

Deep linking

Every view, every record, one URL β€” shareable and auditable.

Shared secrets

Centrally managed credentials. No keys in spreadsheets.

The result: the redundancy and phantom spend you describe β€” eliminated by the architecture itself.

Security & governance as enabler

Architecture and governance aren't the obstacle to innovation β€”

they're what lets you take off with confidence.

SOC 2GDPR Art. 30SSO / SAML 2.0RBACAES-256 at restTLS 1.3 in transitHuman-managed reviewNVIDIA Inception

Resonance point

Your InnovationLab has an identical premise: cybersecurity as enabler. This closes the loop β€” governance, managed human review, and bank-grade certifications baked in from the first commit.

Architecture as a financial asset

A well-architected system is a strategic asset β€” not a technical expense.

Business outcomes first. Technical speed in support.

Customer-reported metrics β€” not independently audited

~44%

Less budget overage

Reported by customers moving from fragmented stacks to decoupled systems.

~67%

More process efficiency

Average reported: one source of truth reduces rework meaningfully.

~2Γ—

Faster than traditional development

Customer-reported. The result is the well-architected system β€” not a shortcut.

How it fits KPMG

We don't compete with KPMG. We're the execution layer.

KPMG's five digital enablement categories β€” and where AgentUI lands:

Interaction

Per-client portals and UIs

Automation

Generated workflows, not manual scripts

Intelligence

Embedded, auditable AI

Information

Single database, deep linking

Environment

Managed hosting, governance included

Trend: advise-and-do

KPMG keeps the relationship, the methodology, and the accountability. AgentUI executes under that governance. The client signs with KPMG; KPMG delivers faster.

Concrete use case β€” Panama

Mid-market logistics: from 15 Excels to a governed system in 7 days.

Architecture-first delivery, end to end.

Representative scenario β€” not a real client
01Day 1

Scoping call

KPMG gathers requirements with the client. AgentUI joins to validate architecture.

02Days 2–3

Architecture-first design

Data model, dependencies, and flows defined before any generation.

03Days 4–7

Working, governed system

Fleet-tracking platform: routes, costs, maintenance, client view.

04Week 2+

KPMG-managed adoption

Onboarding, training, and change management under KPMG methodology.

What you're probably wondering

The four questions before we talk partnership.

Pre-answered so you can forward this deck with confidence.

Q1

Data residency

Where does it host? Does Panama client data stay in-region?

Multi-region hosting. For Panama clients we can deploy in AWS SΓ£o Paulo (LatAm) or in the client's on-premise infrastructure. Data does not leave the agreed jurisdiction.

Q2

IP & data ownership

Who owns the generated code? And the client's data?

The client owns the generated code and the data. AgentUI does not train models on customer data. Explicit clauses in the contract.

Q3

Exit path

If KPMG decides to walk, what happens to the systems in production?

Full code, schema, and data export at any time. No lock-in. The client can continue with an external provider or take it in-house.

Q4

ERP / existing-system integration

Mid-market clients have SAP, Oracle, Salesforce. Does it connect?

Native APIs for major ERP / CRM. Custom integrations as part of scoping. Webhooks and generic connectors for everything else.

The partnership ask

Three models. One recommended.

We start where it makes sense for KPMG β€” and grow from there.

Entry point01

Internal use

KPMG uses AgentUI for its own accelerators, MVPs, and internal tools.

Recommended02

Delivery / reseller partner

AgentUI executes inside KPMG engagements. KPMG keeps the relationship.

Vision03

Co-branded managed offering

Joint KPMG Γ— AgentUI product for Panama mid-market.

Concrete first step of model 2

One pilot engagement. One client. Fixed scope.

We don't commit to a partnership model in the abstract β€” we commit to a bounded test. If it works, we talk about the model. If not, KPMG walks away with zero risk.

The 15-minute conversation

What you walk away with:

A live build of a system relevant to one of your clients

An architecture diagram of how it would fit a KPMG engagement

Zero commitment. Zero generic pitch.

Book the 15 minutes

β€œLet's build the architecture that lets it take off.”

1 / 13